Bashar Adnan Mustafa Malkawi
The present research examines the negative legal impacts resulting from legal regulation of the settlement of collective labor disputes before the labor court according to the Jordanian labor law. The research concludes a set of legal impacts that violate labor rights such as the possibility of disrupting the rule of the legal strike in the Jordanian labor law and the absence of procedural and substantive control over of the work of the labor court. The rule of the legal strike can be disrupted once the dispute is referred to the Conciliation Board or the conciliation delegate according to the procedures set forth in the law, which means that no illicit strike can be achieved. On the other hand, the decisions of the labor court are final, and they are not controlled by any higher court, and the court itself could break its decisions.